WWWBoard/LT
Renaissance Forum  
Humanities & Classics 1002  
  This one isn't about sex

[ HOME] [ POST ] [ SEARCH ] [ HELP ]

[ FOLLOWUPS ] [ POST FOLLOWUP ]

Posted by Alissa Henry on December 09, 1998 at 15:21:42:


One thing that I sort of giggled about during Name of the Rose was the corruption among the monks. Living in their excluded monasaries, depriving themselves of all sorts of humanly things, living the life of a quiet monk. That's what they were supposed to be doing. Instead, there were some who had sex, laughed, and murdered people. Just like the real world. Only they're supposed to be better than us, right? In another one my classes, we had to read Candide by Voltaire. It was written in the 1750s (1754 I think). And in that book, it also portrays monks as disobediant people, no better (and in some cases, far worse) than regular people. They also had sex and were unbelieveably corrupt. and in the movie Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves, there's that priest/monk guy who had kept an extreme amount of wealth. Given all these examples (they're fiction I know, but they had to have been based on some form of truth) I find if odd that people in those times were so religious. How could you follow and listen to and agree with someone who was so hypocritical?

alissa :)


Follow Ups:



POST FOLLOWUP

NAME:
E-MAIL:
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE:

LINK URL:
LINK TITLE:
IMAGE URL:


[ HOME] [ POST ] [ SEARCH ] [ HELP ]

[ FOLLOW UPS ] [ POST FOLLOWUP ]

 

v 1.1
is made possbile
by:
Original WWWBoard design and code by Matt Wright.  See the original at Matt's Script Acrhive. WWWBoard v2.0a © 1998 Matt Wright. WWWBoard/LT Upgrade by Lion Templin of Leonine Computational Resources
© 1998 Lion Templin.
Tom Bacig, University of Minnesota, Duluth. 
© 1998 Tom Bacig.