WWWBoard/LT
Renaissance Forum  
Humanities & Classics 1002  
  Re: 2 cents

[ HOME] [ POST ] [ SEARCH ] [ HELP ]

[ FOLLOWUPS ] [ POST FOLLOWUP ]

Posted by Andy Goenner on December 16, 1998 at 01:33:40:

In Reply to: 2 cents posted by Rylan Bachman on December 16, 1998 at 00:07:22:

I completely agree with you. The scene was an integral part of the movie. Maybe I didn't make my point very well in the last post. I continually forget that sarcasm doesn't work very well through the written word. I was arguing that the sex scene DID belong in the movie, for the very reason that it is an important plot device. The reason I was arguing from the censorship standpoint is because the previous argument was the the sex scene should be removed because it wasn't "clean" enough, not because it wasn't important. That just made it seem to me like a censorship thing, and I just wanted to point out the snowball effect. And come to mention it, why are so many people complaining about the girl's nudity, but not the guy's??
Andy "The Truth ISN'T out There, because it doesn't exist" Goenner


Follow Ups:



POST FOLLOWUP

NAME:
E-MAIL:
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE:

LINK URL:
LINK TITLE:
IMAGE URL:


[ HOME] [ POST ] [ SEARCH ] [ HELP ]

[ FOLLOW UPS ] [ POST FOLLOWUP ]

 

v 1.1
is made possbile
by:
Original WWWBoard design and code by Matt Wright.  See the original at Matt's Script Acrhive. WWWBoard v2.0a © 1998 Matt Wright. WWWBoard/LT Upgrade by Lion Templin of Leonine Computational Resources
© 1998 Lion Templin.
Tom Bacig, University of Minnesota, Duluth. 
© 1998 Tom Bacig.