This site is designed for accessibility. Content is obtainable and functional to any browser or Internet device. This site's full visual experience is available in a graphical browser that supports web standards. Please consider upgrading your web browser.
"We can rely on browser makers to be more consistent than they have been in the past-- but as you can see from the charts, pure consistency still eludes us. There may be cases where you have to choose the DOCTYPE carefully, but there should never be a case where you have to lie. Here is my advice: If you want "standards" mode, then pick the appropriate Strict DOCTYPE and make sure your markup validates. If you want "quirks" mode, do not include any DOCTYPE at all, and make sure your markup is valid. This is especially true of XHTML, because all XHTML DOCTYPEs trigger "standards" mode. If you are authoring in XHTML but for some reason want browsers to use "quirks" to render the document, then leave off the DOCTYPE completely. "
Good advise...the only problem I can see with using this method is...If you
want "quirks" mode AND do not include any doctype AND you want it to pass the
W3C Validator. Even though your markup is valid, the W3C Validator will choke
on the document.
--LLC