Craig Stroupe | COMP 5220
Checklist: The Revision of Ad Project
Not Attempted | Improvement
Needed | SATisfactory | EXcellent
Criteria |
NA |
IN |
SAT |
EX |
Notes: |
Robin Williams’ PARC |
|
||||
uses proximity to suggest grouping and
relationships and to control how many times the eye stops |
|
|
|
|
|
alignment unifies parts,
simplifies design, limits numbers of lines.
In Williams’ words, “Find a good
line and use it.” |
|
|
|
|
|
repetition unifies design, suggests
significant relationships of parts, establishes a visual rhythm to the ad |
|
|
|
|
|
contrasts of sizes, styles, tones, colors,
etc. create a sense of richness (while avoiding conflicts and complication in
design), suggests relationships of parts, highlights key ideas and rhetorical
effects |
|
|
|
|
|
white (negative) space used
effectively to create sense of proximity, to highlight focal elements, to
emphasize the visual rhythm of the ad.
Avoids trapped or accidental white space. |
|
|
|
|
|
use of PARC makes the revision both richer and
simpler than the original |
|
|
|
|
|
Type and Text |
|||||
concordant and contrasting types
used consciously and effectively to create appropriate tone, heighten message
and effect of ad. |
|
|
|
|
|
type styles used strategically and
thoughtfully |
|
|
|
|
|
“voice” and tone
consistent and appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
Hook and Focus |
|||||
the eye has a clear “landing pad” in the ad,
which also works rhetorically to emphasize the message and tone |
|
|
|
|
|
the ad is more than a
list, but has a clear message or theme, which is emphasized by the choices of
design and typefaces. |
|
|
|
|
|
flow of the ad from the
focal point through the other content. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rhetorical Concerns
(ethos and pathos) |
|||||
Revised ad creates/improves the implied
rhetorical image of the advertiser (ethos). (What constitutes improvement depends on
the tastes and culture of the audience.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised ad creates/improves the implied
rhetorical image of the audience (pathos) |
|
|
|
|
|
The revision generally makes the product more appealing
to the intended audience |
|
|
|
|
|
The sense of audience that apparent from the
ad is focused and improved in the revision |
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary |
|||||
commentary demonstrates thorough understanding
of the challenges of applying PARC, or making decisions about type styles,
etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
commentary deals with challenges of focus,
theme and tone |
|
|
|
|
|
commentary speaks thoughtfully to the
rhetorical questions of ethos and pathos |
|
|
|
|
|
commentary: general level of detail and
specificity |
|
|
|
|
|
commentary: informed
by readings, thoughtful use of terms |
|
|
|
|